Walter Salles’ “I’m Still Here”

A Cinematic Reflection on Brazil’s Political Turmoil

eyesonbrasil

Amsterdam, February 21^st, 2025 – Walter Salles’ latest film, “I’m Still Here,” starring the brilliant Fernanda Torres, has captivated audiences and critics alike with its poignant portrayal of a family’s struggle during Brazil’s military dictatorship. The film, which has garnered multiple Oscar nominations, including Best Picture and Best Actress for Torres, delves deep into the personal and political upheavals of the 1970s, offering a powerful commentary on the current state of Brazil’s democracy.

A Story of Resilience and Injustice

Fernanda Torres plays Eunice Paiva, the wife of congressman Rubens, who was taken by Brazilian military police in 1971 and never seen again (Credit: Sony Pictures Classics)

“I’m Still Here” is based on the memoir of Marcelo Rubens Paiva, chronicling the harrowing experiences of his family during the military regime. The film centers on Eunice Paiva, played masterfully by Fernanda Torres, whose husband, Rubens Paiva, a former congressman and vocal critic of the dictatorship, is forcibly taken from their home and never seen again. Eunice’s relentless quest for truth and justice spans decades, highlighting the resilience of those who dared to stand against oppression.

Political Implications in Modern Brazil

The release of “I’m Still Here” comes at a time when Brazil is grappling with significant political challenges. The Supreme Court has faced accusations of judicial arbitrariness, and there are growing concerns about restrictions on freedom of speech. The film’s depiction of state-sponsored violence and censorship during the dictatorship serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of authoritarianism.

A photograph of the real Paiva family, including Eunice and Rubens – director Walter Salles knew them personally as a teenager (Credit: Lais Morais/ Reuters)

Lessons from the Past

Brazil’s military dictatorship, which lasted from 1964 to 1985, was marked by severe political repression, censorship, and human rights abuses. The experiences of that era offer valuable lessons for contemporary Brazil. To prevent authoritarian overreach, it is crucial to uphold the principles of democracy, transparency, and accountability. Ensuring an independent judiciary, protecting freedom of speech, and fostering a culture of human rights are essential steps in safeguarding democracy.

The Role of Cinema in Political Discourse

Films like “I’m Still Here” play a vital role in political discourse by bringing historical injustices to the forefront and encouraging reflection on current issues. Walter Salles’ meticulous direction and Fernanda Torres’ powerful performance create an emotional connection with the audience, making the film not just a historical recount but a call to action. It reminds us that the fight for justice and democracy is ongoing and that we must remain vigilant against any threats to our freedoms.

Conclusion

“I’m Still Here” is more than just a film; it is a testament to the enduring spirit of those who resist oppression and a poignant reminder of the importance of safeguarding democratic values. As Brazil navigates its current political landscape, the lessons from its past, as depicted in Salles’ film, are more relevant than ever. By learning from history and remaining committed to the principles of justice and freedom, Brazil can work towards a future where the horrors of authoritarianism are never repeated.

How Lula takes advantage of the film

President Lula has leveraged the film “I’m Still Here” to highlight the importance of remembering Brazil’s past and the dangers of authoritarianism. By drawing parallels between the military dictatorship depicted in the film and current political challenges, Lula emphasizes the need to protect democratic values and human rights. The film’s portrayal of state-sponsored violence and censorship serves as a powerful reminder of the consequences of authoritarian rule, reinforcing Lula’s message of vigilance against any threats to democracy.

Lula’s administration has used the film to foster a sense of national unity and resilience, encouraging Brazilians to reflect on their history and remain committed to democratic principles. By supporting the film and its themes, Lula aims to strengthen his political stance against judicial arbitrariness and restrictions on freedom of speech, advocating for a more transparent and accountable government.

The visit of the OEA reveals a different picture

The recent visit by the Organization of American States (OEA) to Brazil has highlighted concerns about censorship and political repression, drawing stark parallels to the country’s past under military dictatorship. The OEA’s special rapporteur for freedom of expression, Pedro Vaca, met with various Brazilian authorities, including members of the Supreme Court, to discuss issues related to freedom of expression and the digital environment.

During the visit, discussions centered around the events of January 8, 2023, and the subsequent actions taken by the government, including the blocking of social media platforms and the investigation of individuals involved in anti-democratic activities. These measures have raised alarms about potential overreach and the suppression of dissent, reminiscent of the authoritarian practices during the military regime from 1964 to 1985.

The OEA’s findings serve as a crucial reminder of the importance of safeguarding democratic principles and human rights. The experiences of the military dictatorship underscore the need for vigilance against any form of government overreach that threatens freedom of speech and political expression. By learning from history, Brazil can work towards ensuring that such dark chapters are never repeated, and that democracy remains robust and resilient.